 Decisional needs assessment of patients with complex care needs in primary care: a participatory systematic mixed studies review protocolMathieu Bujold,
Pierre Pluye,
France Legare,
Jeannie Haggerty,
Genevieve C Gore,
Reem El Sherif,
Marie-Eve Poitras,
Marie-Claude Beaulieu,
Marie-Dominique Beaulieu,
Paula L. Bush,
Yves Couturier,
Beatrice Débarges,
Justin Gagnon,
Anik Giguère,
Roland Grad,
Vera Granikov,
Serge Goulet,
Catherine Hudon,
Bernardo Kremer,
Edeltraut Kröger,
Irina Kudrina,
Bertrand Lebouché,
Christine Loignon,
Marie-Therese Lussier,
Cristiano Martello,
Quynh Nguyen,
Rebekah Pratt,
Benoit Rihoux,
Ellen Rosenberg,
Isabelle Samson,
Nicolas Senn,
David Li Tang,
Masashi Tsujimoto,
Isabelle Vedel,
Bruno Ventelou and
Michel Wensing
Post-Print from HAL Abstract: Introduction Patients with complex care needs (PCCNs) often suffer from combinations of multiple chronic conditions, mental health problems, drug interactions and social vulnerability, which can lead to healthcare services overuse, underuse or misuse. Typically, PCCNs face interactional issues and unmet decisional needs regarding possible options in a cascade of interrelated decisions involving different stakeholders (themselves, their families, their caregivers, their healthcare practitioners). Gaps in knowledge, values clarification and social support in situations where options need to be deliberated hamper effective decision support interventions. This review aims to (1) assess decisional needs of PCCNs from the perspective of stakeholders, (2) build a taxonomy of these decisional needs and (3) prioritise decisional needs with knowledge users (clinicians, patients and managers). Methods and analysis This review will be based on the interprofessional shared decision making (IP-SDM) model and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. Applying a participatory research approach, we will identify potentially relevant studies through a comprehensive literature search; select relevant ones using eligibility criteria inspired from our previous scoping review on PCCNs; appraise quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool; conduct a three-step synthesis (sequential exploratory mixed methods design) to build taxonomy of key decisional needs; and integrate these results with those of a parallel PCCNs' qualitative decisional need assessment (semistructured interviews and focus group with stakeholders). Ethics and dissemination This systematic review, together with the qualitative study (approved by the Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et Service Sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean ethical committee), will produce a working taxonomy of key decisional needs (ontological contribution), to inform the subsequent user-centred design of a support tool for addressing PCCNs' decisional needs (practical contribution). We will adapt the IP-SDM model, normally dealing with a single decision, for PCCNs who experience cascade of decisions involving different stakeholders (theoretical contribution). Knowledge users will facilitate dissemination of the results in the Canadian primary care network. PROSPERO registration number CRD42015020558. Keywords: interprofessional care; patients with complex care needs; primary care; shared decision making (search for similar items in EconPapers) Published in BMJ Open, 2017, 7 (11), pp.e016400. ⟨10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016400⟩ There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01682988 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016400 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Post-Print from HAL |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.