EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparing Luenberger and Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicators: How well is total factor productivity approximated?

Kristiaan Kerstens (), Zhiyang Shen () and Ignace Van De Woestyne ()
Additional contact information
Ignace Van De Woestyne: Department of Economics - Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel

Post-Print from HAL

Date: 2018-01
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01744631
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12) Track citations by RSS feed

Published in International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, 2018, 195, pp.311 - 318. ⟨10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.010⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Comparing Luenberger and Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicators: How well is total factor productivity approximated? (2018) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01744631

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.010

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2022-01-15
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01744631