Interactions between agricultural economics and environmental and resource economics in European research: Insights from the theory of non-renewable resources

Philippe Bontems, Vincent Martinet, Gilles Rotillon and Cees Withagen
Additional contact information
Philippe Bontems: GREMAQ - Groupe de recherche en économie mathématique et quantitative - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Gilles Rotillon: EconomiX - EconomiX - UPN - Université Paris Nanterre - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Agricultural Economics and Environmental and Resource Economics are two fields which cross-fertilized each other. These interactions are expected to grow in the near future, as the sustainability of agriculture is challenged by the depletion of natural resources. In this article, we focus on three topics in natural resource economics: the resource curse, the sustainable development, and the green paradox. Insights from these topics are then used to discuss the future challenges to be addressed in agricultural economics. The literature on the resource curse examines the links between resource rent and economic development, and emphasizes that resource richness may jeopardize economic growth. The recent boom in agricultural commodity prices may lock developing countries in a poverty trap if the rent from agricultural products exports is not properly reinvested. The economics literature on sustainable development emphasizes that defining sustainability is a difficult task, and that there is not a unanimous sustainability criterion to be applied to agriculture. Here again, the question of capital depreciation and investment for future generations is central and calls for the valuation of the capital assets agriculture relies on. The literature on the green paradox questions the effectiveness of well-intended environmental policies and their possible counter-productive effects. Improperly defined policies, such as biofuel subsidies and mandate, or land use constraints aiming at preserving biodiversity, may result in more rapid resource degradation.

Keywords: growth and sustainable development; agricultural economics; environmental and resource economics; exhaustible resources; green paradox; environmental policies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-06-30
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01884938v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement - Review of agricultural and environmental studies, 2015, 96 (1), pp.167 - 185. ⟨10.4074/S1966960715001083⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-01884938v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Interactions between agricultural economics and environmental and resource economics in European research: Insights from the theory of non-renewable resources (2015)
Journal Article: Interactions between agricultural economics and environmental and resource economics in European research: Insights from the theory of non-renewable resources (2015)
Journal Article: Interactions between agricultural economics and environmental and resource economics in European research: Insights from the theory of non-renewable resources (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01884938

DOI: 10.4074/S1966960715001083

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().