Les réticences à évaluer économiquement les projets de SI: propositions d’explication

Bernard Quinio ()
Additional contact information
Bernard Quinio: UN - Université de Nantes, Ecole Supérieure de Commerce de Paris

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The economic evaluation of Information System project (the weighting up of investment and expected benefits) has been primarly adressed to answer the question " how to do it ". Several interesting propositions have been made in order to make this evaluation; some of them have been tested. Nevertheless, the practice of evaluation is poor and the 'productivity paradox of Information Technology' is still alive. A new approach of evaluation is proposed. " Why so many enterprises do not evaluate their projects ? " The answer can be found more in the actors' social-interests than in new evaluations techniques.

Keywords: Project; Semiotic; Agency theory; Information System; Systèmes d'Information; Projet; Evaluation; Sémiotique; Théorie de l'Agence (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1998
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.parisnanterre.fr/hal-01909127
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in Systèmes d'Information et Management, 1998, 3 (2), pp.43-64

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.parisnanterre.fr/hal-01909127/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01909127

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().