EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A winner’s curse in the bidding process for broadcasting rights in football? The cases of the French and UK markets

Antoine Feuillet (), Nicolas Scelles () and Christophe Durand ()
Additional contact information
Antoine Feuillet: CesamS - Centre d'étude sport et actions motrices - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université
Nicolas Scelles: Manchester Metropolitan University Business School - MMU - Manchester Metropolitan University
Christophe Durand: CesamS - Centre d'étude sport et actions motrices - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The winner's curse is a well-known phenomenon in the auction theory. The main aim of this article is to verify its existence in football broadcasting rights. The underlying objective is to assess whether some indices of this situation are verified and can cause a winner's curse. The methodology is based on the application of Andreff (2014)'s six indices and a seventh index(disappointment)to the domestic markets for broadcasting rights of the French and English football leagues. These two markets have seen an increase in the number of packages offered to broadcasters, with the possibility of several ‘winners'. The paper shows that the winner of the major packages in the auction is not cursed. The curse is more likely to happen for the second mover. As such, the paper suggests a practical recommendation for broadcasters interested in football rights: win the best package or keep away.

Keywords: Winner’s curse; Football broadcasting rights; First mover advantage; Second mover disadvantage; Bidding process; Broadcast packages (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-06-21
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-01935541v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in EURAM 2017 : Making Knowledge Work, Jun 2017, Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom. pp.1198-1224, ⟨10.1080/17430437.2018.1505869⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-01935541v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01935541

DOI: 10.1080/17430437.2018.1505869

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01935541