An analysis of the methodologies adopted by CSR rating agencies

Khaled Saadaoui () and Teerooven Soobaroyen
Additional contact information
Khaled Saadaoui: EM Normandie - École de Management de Normandie = EM Normandie Business School
Teerooven Soobaroyen: Essex Business School - University of Essex

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This paper aims to analyse the similarities and differences in the methodologies adopted by corporate social responsibility (CSR) rating agencies. The authors gather secondary and primary evidences of practices from selected agencies on the methodologies and criteria they rely upon to assess a firm's CSR performance. The authors find not only evidence of similarities in the methodologies adopted by the CSR rating agencies (e.g. the use of environment, social and governance themes, exclusion criteria, adoption of positive criteria, client/"customised" input, quantification) but also several elements of differences, namely, in terms of the thresholds for exclusion, transparent vs confidential approach, industry-specific ratings and weights for each dimension. Drawing from Sandberg et al.'s (2009) conceptualisations, the authors tentatively argue that this mixed picture may reflect competing organisational pressures to adopt a differentiation approach at the strategic and practical levels whilst recognising, and incorporating, the "globalising" tendencies of the CSR business at the terminological levels. Although these data are based on a relatively small number of agencies, the findings and analysis convey some implications for users of CSR ratings and policymakers, particularly in light of the recent Paris 2016 Agreement on Climate Change and the increased emphasis on the monitoring of social, environmental and governance performance. The authors contribute to the literature by highlighting how key intermediate rating organisations operationalise notions of CSR.

Keywords: Corporate social responsibility (CSR); CSR rating agencies; Socially responsible investment (SRI) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018-03-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Published in Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 2018, 9 (1), pp.43-62. ⟨10.1108/SAMPJ-06-2016-0031⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01954551

DOI: 10.1108/SAMPJ-06-2016-0031

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().