From peace through free trade to interventionism for the peace

Fanny Coulomb () and Alain Alcouffe
Additional contact information
Fanny Coulomb: CESICE - Centre d'études sur la sécurité internationale et les coopérations européennes - IEPG - Sciences Po Grenoble - Institut d'études politiques de Grenoble - UGA [2016-2019] - Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019], PACTE - Pacte, Laboratoire de sciences sociales - IEPG - Sciences Po Grenoble - Institut d'études politiques de Grenoble - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UGA [2016-2019] - Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019], IEPG - Sciences Po Grenoble - Institut d'études politiques de Grenoble

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The expression "military Keynesianism", much in use during the Cold war USA-USSR arms race, has contributed to feed suspicion that Keynes had sympathies for rearmament or war as instruments of economic recovery, or even for authoritarian regimes. His hostility toward free trade at a time of economic crisis gave him the image of someone who supports economic nationalism, which often goes hand in hand with militarism (cf. Friedrich List, 1840). A reading of Keynes' works allows to challenge these assumptions. In fact, the pacifism has left its mark on his thought and his concern for the economic crisis is directly linked to his opposition to the war, though he considered it to be unavoidable, in the absence of a return to prosperity. The young Keynes is influenced by the Liberal thought and pacifism, which prevails among economists at the beginning of the 20th century. Close to conscientious objectors, he is then in accordance with the ideas developed by the future Nobel Peace Prize, Norman Angell, who advocates for an European disarmament. (Part I). Having become economic adviser to the Treasury in 1915 and therefore directly interested in the issue of war financing, Keynes actively militates against the option of a total war for Great Britain. He even almost resigned when the British government calls for conscription. We will show that his thought in the 1920's is characterised by a radical critique of the revenge spirit and a call to international cooperation. The Economic Consequences of the Peace (1919) became extremely successful as a major critique of the Treaty of Versailles (Part II). Finally, we will show in a third part how, during the 1930's, while the economic crisis persists and rearmament accelerates, Keynes develops an original theory, breaking from liberalism and being tested by the massive increase in European military expenditures. Keynes' thought has changed in the interwar period, following a careful thought on war economic and financial issues. Indeed, the "Keynesian revolution" may have mainly emerged from empirical reflections on war causes and peace conditions. In Keynes' thought, war, however detestable, enables the development of new solutions of economic policy and of international cooperation, through international institutions.

Date: 2017-05-18
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02051622v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in 21st Annual ESHET Conference - Rationality in Economics, The European Society for the History of Economic Thought (ESHET), May 2017, Antwerp, Belgium

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-02051622v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02051622

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().