COMPARAISON DE LA MAITRISE DES ERREURS SYSTEMATIQUES A TRAVERS PLUSIEURS SECTEURS D'ACTIVITE

A CROSS-DOMAIN COMPARISON OF SYSTEMATIC ERRORS CONTROL STRATEGIES

Bertrand Ricque, Philippe Baufreton, Jean-Paul Blanquart () and Jean-Louis Boulanger
Additional contact information
Bertrand Ricque: SAFRAN Group
Philippe Baufreton: SAFRAN Group
Jean-Paul Blanquart: Airbus Defence and Space [Toulouse]
Jean-Louis Boulanger: CERTIFER

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: All domain specific safety frameworks account for controlling introduction of systematic errors and mitigating their effect on system mission and environment. However they exhibit differences according to application sectors. The position of safety standards regarding systematic failures quantification is also variable and reveals significant differences deserving some further analysis. In this paper, we analyse how different standards account, or not, for the contribution of systematic errors to overall failures rates. We describe how different strategies for systematic error control have an impact on system engineering. We expose the underlying approach of each sector and explore the specific aspects of systematic errors control at item level versus system level.

Date: 2018-10-16
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02066561
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Congrès Lambda Mu 21, « Maîtrise des risques et transformation numérique : opportunités et menaces », Oct 2018, Reims, France

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-02066561/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02066561

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().