Managing Strategic Discussions in Organizations: A Habermasian Perspective

Mathieu Detchessahar () and Benoît Journé ()
Additional contact information
Mathieu Detchessahar: LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - IEMN-IAE Nantes - Institut d'Économie et de Management de Nantes - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - UN - Université de Nantes
Benoît Journé: IEMN-IAE Nantes - Institut d'Économie et de Management de Nantes - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - UN - Université de Nantes

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The paper draws on Jurgen Habermas' theory of communicative action to propose a renewed theoretical framework for "strategy work" (Mantere & Vaara, 2008) and "strategic episodes" (Alvesson & Sandberg, 2011; Corley & Gioia, 2011; Hendry & Seidl, 2003). While recognizing that the use of Habermas is quite problematic in organization studies-largely because his theory deals with democracies and free discussion, which have been presented by Habermas himself as incompatible with any kinds of management and hierarchical organizations-we argue that such a perspective is not only conceptually possible but also very useful for practitioners. In a provocative way, we assume that discussions in organizational settings have to be managed to become free and produce the outcomes expected from a discussion. Our research provides a theoretical framework to describe how interpersonal communication unfolds as well as guidelines, in a normative perspective, for organizing an ideal speech situation in order to support strategic discussion. We identify organizational and managerial conditions for the design and management of "strategic episodes" and "discussions". Finally, our results contribute to the strategy-as-practice and the CCO (communication constitutes organizations) literatures. They are discussed as a way to strengthen the "dialogization" (Detchessahar, Gentil, Grevin & Journé, 2017) discourse that impedes the participation of various groups of practitioners in strategy work.

Keywords: strategic episode; discussion; communication; change; strategizing; Habermas (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02070709
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Published in M@n@gement, 2018, 21, pp.773 - 802. ⟨10.3917/mana.212.0773⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-02070709/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02070709

DOI: 10.3917/mana.212.0773

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().