EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Impacts of the Québec carbon emissions trading scheme on plant-level performance and employment

Julien Hanoteau and David Talbot
Additional contact information
David Talbot: ENAP - École nationale d'administration publique (Québec, Province)

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: In 2013, Québec implemented a greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions trading system (QC ETS), despite opposition from industry, which feared loss of competitiveness and warned about job destruction. This article assesses the impact of that carbon regulation on industrial facilities in Québec. Conditional difference-in-differences ordinary least squares regressions show that regulated plants reduced their GHG emissions by about 9.8%, employment by about 6.8% and carbon intensity by about 3.7% more compared to non-regulated plants in the rest of Canada during the period 2013–2015. This suggests that facilities adapted to the new program by improving their technology, but first and foremost by scaling down their activity, which raises questions about the ability of the QC ETS to induce enough environmental investment and innovation in industrial facilities. The results, in terms of employment effects, contrast with the findings of similar studies on the early stages of the European ETS and the British Columbia carbon tax scheme, and this information challenges the initial allocation scheme for permits, in particular, with a view to a green fiscal reform.

Keywords: Environmental regulation; carbon market; employment; climate policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene and nep-env
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://amu.hal.science/hal-02151028
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Published in Carbon Management, 2019, 10 (3), pp.287-298. ⟨10.1080/17583004.2019.1595154⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://amu.hal.science/hal-02151028/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02151028

DOI: 10.1080/17583004.2019.1595154

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-31
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02151028