 Comparabilité des domaines scientifiques: la pondération "côté citant" des réseaux de citationMichel Zitt
Post-Print from HAL Abstract: The volume of scientific literature increases by a few million articles each year. The "publish or perish" requirement or its "publish, be cited or perish", variant accelerates the growth of this collective memory, available in condensed or complete form in specialized databases and web engines. The explicit or implicit networks revealed by articles' data are exploited by social sciences – scientometrics, economics and sociology – and also instrumented in research evaluation. Scientometric indicators result from elaborations on these data, with various operations : counting options ; normalisation per/by field or type of research ; type of indicator ; economic valuing ; composite indicators schemes... Here we focus on a particular weighting of the citation network. Midway between the classical normalization techniques, and the recursive influence measures of Pagerank type, it introduces a new family of normalization and a general tool to measure citation exchanges, a proxy of knowledge flows. Keywords: pondération côté citant; scientometrics; indicator; normalization; scientométrie; indicateur; réseau de citations; normalisation; échange de citation; économie (search for similar items in EconPapers) Published in Revue Economique, 2015, 66 (1), pp.289-310 There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02170457 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Post-Print from HAL |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.