Supply chain actors’ willingness when facing the challenge of concerted logistics pooling: the key role of the LSP

La volonté des acteurs de la supply chain face au défi de la mutualisation logistique concertée: le rôle clé du PSL

Valérie Michon () and Claire Capo ()
Additional contact information
Valérie Michon: CRET-LOG - Centre de Recherche sur le Transport et la Logistique - AMU - Aix Marseille Université
Claire Capo: NIMEC - Normandie Innovation Marché Entreprise Consommation - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - ULH - Université Le Havre Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - IRIHS - Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire Homme et Société - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Even though logistic activities are suffering environmental, legal and economic pressures, logistic pooling is not as successful as might have been expected. Forms of complete cooperation, such as concerted logistics pooling (CLP), involve a change in actors' behaviour, whatever their characteristics or objectives. The CLP presented in this research faces obstacles to its development which seem difficult to overcome. In that case, the logistics service provider (LSP) might play a key role in shippers' decision to adopt a logistics pooling solution. Six CLP case studies reveal the impact of obstacles and benefits perceived by actors, and the LSP's role in solving these obstacles and in the actors' willingness to develop a logistics pooling

Keywords: Cooperation; Logistic service providers; LSP’s role; Logistics pooling; Mutualisation logistique; Coopération; Prestataires de services logistiques (PSL); Rôle du PSL (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019-06-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Logistique & Management, 2019, Dossier spécial « La mutualisation logistique : passé, présent et futur. Quels enseignements organisationnels et disciplinaires ? », 27 (2), pp.88-107. ⟨10.1080/12507970.2019.1597646⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02269703

DOI: 10.1080/12507970.2019.1597646

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().