Business Groups reconsidered: beyond paragons and parasites

Carney Michael, Estrin Saul, van Essen Marc and Shapiro Daniel
Additional contact information
Carney Michael: EM - EMLyon Business School

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: In this paper, we consider the potential paths of Business Group's (BGs) evolution. We organize our analysis around the two dominant perspectives on BGs: institutional voids (IV) and entrenchment/exploitation (EE). We suggest that the empirical evidence does not entirely support either perspective, and neither fully predicts what we sometimes observe; namely that BGs not only persist and thrive, but also sometimes do so as internationally competitive firms. This indicates that a more contextualized approach is required, and we propose a conceptual framework that can guide future thinking. In so doing, we take explicit account of two key factors relevant to the dynamics of BG evolution: the state's capacity to create market-supporting institutions and the ability of business groups to adapt to evolving institutions. Our framework accommodates the possibility of multiple outcomes, including ones consistent with the IV and EE perspectives, but also ones consistent with the internationalization of BGs, including those from emerging markets.

Keywords: business groups; Institutional voids; role of the state; group adaptation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018-11-29
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Academy of Management Perspectives, 2018, 32 (4)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02276716

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().