Crowdsourcing of inventive activities

Julien Pénin () and Thierry Burger-Helmchen

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is twofold: First we define the concept of Crowdsourcing of Inventive Activities (CIA) and we emphasise its differences with the crowdsourcing of routine activities and the crowdsourcing of content. Then we stress the advantages and limits of CIA by using two complementary theories of the firm: Transaction cost theory and the evolutionary theory of the firm. Specifically, we show that CIA may emerge only if knowledge is sufficiently codified and if a legal protection is possible (e.g. via patents). This work therefore builds theoretical predictions that can be tested in further works. Beyond this analysis, our work underlines issues for the traditional theories of the firm that will have to be clarified: for instance, does the emergence of crowdsourcing lead to rethinking the reasons why firms exist and the definition of their boundaries?

Keywords: Crowdsourcing; Knowledge; Know-how; Governance; Transaction cost theory; Evolutionary theories of the firm; Inventive activities; Innovation; Legal protection; Patents (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011-01-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

Published in International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 2011, 5 (2-3), pp.246-263. ⟨10.1504/IJISD.2011.043068⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02302862

DOI: 10.1504/IJISD.2011.043068

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().