The Human Being is a couple

L’être humain est un couple

Marlyse Pouchol
Additional contact information
Marlyse Pouchol: URCA - Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, CLERSÉ - Centre Lillois d’Études et de Recherches Sociologiques et Économiques - UMR 8019 - Université de Lille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Proudhon functionalizes the difference of the sexes to establish that "the human being is a couple". He makes it the real actor of the social revolution that he wishes to see accomplished. By resorting to Hannah Arendt, the article shows that Proudhon addresses issues that economic theory has then obscured by building itself as a science, in the way of Marx or that of Walras, by partitioning and prioritizing a reality that he grasped in its many aspects.

Keywords: Pierre-Joseph Proudhon; gender; family and economy; economic science and reality; famille et économie; science économique et réalité (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019-07-03
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Revue d'histoire de la pensée économique, 2019, Revue d’histoire de la pensée économique 2019 – 1, n° 7, 2019 – 1 (n° 7), pp.141-170. ⟨10.15122/isbn.978-2-406-09425-8.p.0141⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02304963

DOI: 10.15122/isbn.978-2-406-09425-8.p.0141

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().