Key account management in business markets: an empirical test of common assumptions

Catherine Pardo and Björn Sven Ivens
Additional contact information
Catherine Pardo: EM - EMLyon Business School

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Purpose – The concept of key account management (KAM) has received considerable attention from practitioners and scholars for well over 20 years now. However, numerous articles build on a set of tacit assumptions for which we lack empirical evidence. This paper seeks to propose an empirical test of several of these assumptions. - Design/methodology/approach – The contribution draws on a study conducted among 297 purchasing managers in two industries (packaging goods, market research data). - Findings – The findings indicate that parts of the foundations of KAM are not as solid as they may appear at first sight. - Practical implications – This paper invites managers of KAM programs to carefully consider the objectives they assign to such programs by integrating the idea of value created both for key customers and for suppliers implementing such programs. - Originality/value – The paper extends knowledge of key account management in the business field by providing new – and, in the light of the extant literature, sometimes rather counter-intuitive – insights in this important management phenomenon. It does this by systematically comparing key account relationships and non-key account relationships. // Keywords: Transaction costs, Buyer-seller relationships, Resource management

Date: 2008-07-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Published in Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 2008, 23 (5), pp.301-310 P

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02311744

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().