Musings of a double-blind peer reviewer

Agnès Nairn
Additional contact information
Agnès Nairn: EM - EMLyon Business School

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Double-blind peer review is a fine process. Those in the academic community who refuse the role of reviewer because they are too busy with their research (which they will expect to be reviewed) might like to ponder on the very fundamental place the review process occupies in the academic community. And the vast majority who do review, rather than reviewing it as an unrewarded burden, might like to bask in a warm glow of personal satisfaction in the contribution they are making.

Date: 2007-03-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in International Journal of Advertising, 2007, 26 (2), pp.280 P

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02311764

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().