Reconciling opposites in organisation studies: An Aristotelian approach to modernism and post-modernism

Eero Vaara and Marja-Liisa Kakkuri-Knuuttila
Additional contact information
Eero Vaara: EM - EMLyon Business School

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: In view of the current fragmentation in management and organisation studies, we argue that there is a need to elaborate techniques that help reconcile contradictory and superficially incommensurable standpoints. For this purpose, we draw on ‘pre-modern' Aristotelian epistemological and methodological sources, particularly the idea of ‘saving the appearances' (SA), not previously introduced into organisation studies. Using SA as our starting point, we outline a methodology that helps to develop reasonable and acceptable intermediary positions in contemporary debates between ‘modernism' and ‘post-modernism'. We illustrate the functioning of SA in the case of three issues in the philosophy of science where ‘modernist' and ‘post-modernist' scholars seem to have incommensurable standpoints: the nature of scientific knowledge; the conception of causality; and the epistemology of practice. We show in particular how to use the logics of ‘qualification', ‘new conception', and ‘complementary combination' to form the basis for mediating positions which could then be accepted by less extreme proponents of both ‘modernism' and ‘postmodernism'.

Date: 2007-01-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Philosophy of management, 2007, 6 (1), pp.97-114 P

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02311797

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().