The Art of Piloting New Initiatives

Bettina Buchel and Rhoda Davidson
Additional contact information
Bettina Buchel: E3 Associates
Rhoda Davidson: IMD

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Successful multinationals get that way by finding progressively better ways to leverage good operational improvements across the entire company. But developing such superior processes is not easy. As few as one in three new process initiatives succeeds. Each failure can cost the company as much as $10 million in development costs not to mention foregoing the hundreds of millions of dollars that a successful initiative might have generated. New operational ideas fail for many reasons. However, the experience and research of these authors suggests that one of the most common is not that the idea was bad, but that the developers set up a pilot that failed to persuade managers in the units that the process was an improvement. If the pilot covers business units, customer types, or products and services that the managers who are expected to roll out the innovation don't see as analogous to their own units situation, the working template may be viewed as insufficient to be considered a reliable experiment. Many of these failures can be avoided. Specifically, the authors find that successful pilots share three qualities: credibility, replicability and feasibility. The pilot location must seem credible in that the situations and challenges seem familiar to the managers who are expected to eventually adopt it into their own units. It needs to be replicable as well, and capable of being turned into a template that can be rapidly introduced in a variety of locations. Finally, its results must meet the expectations of multiple stakeholders.

Keywords: Operations research; Studies; Multinational corporations; Organization development; Innovations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011-09-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in MIT Sloan Management Review, 2011, 53 (1), 79-86 p

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02312029

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().