To trust is good, but to control is better: How investors discipline financial advisors’ activity

Riccardo Calcagno, Maela Giofre' () and Maria Cesira Urzi-Brancati
Additional contact information
Riccardo Calcagno: EM - EMLyon Business School
Maria Cesira Urzi-Brancati: Collegio Carlo Alberto - UNITO - Università degli studi di Torino = University of Turin
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Maria Cesira Urzì Brancati

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Using a survey of clients from one of the largest Italian banks, we find that investors with low level of trust in professional advisors seek financial counselling, but make their decisions autonomously. We investigate whether these investors exert some form of control over the recommendations they receive, and, if so, which one. Investors can push advisors to provide better recommendations either by asking for a second expert's opinion, such as in the case of credence services, or by monitoring closely the advisor's activity themselves. We find that three quarters of investors do not exert any control on advisors. Different types of financial competence – self-assessed or test-based – serve different purposes. The investors featuring higher self-assessed financial competence are more likely to control the advisor's activity. The mechanism through which investors exert control over the advisors' activity depends instead on the investors' degree of test-based financial literacy. Investors with high financial literacy directly monitor the advisors' activity. Investors with low financial literacy are more likely to seek a second professional opinion in support of the recommendations previously received. Our findings suggest that improving investors financial knowledge may foster direct control of the advisor's activity. Moreover, facilitating the comparison between financial products by standardized and centralized information may be very effective to protect poorly literate investors.

Keywords: Financial advice; Financial literacy; Credence services (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-08-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Published in Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2017, 140, 287-316 p. ⟨10.1016/j.jebo.2017.04.010⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: To trust is good, but to control is better: How investors discipline financial advisors’ activity (2017)
Working Paper: To Trust is Good, but to Control Is Better: How Investors Discipline Financial Advisors'Activity (2017)
Working Paper: To trust is good, but to control is better: how investors discipline financial advisors’ activity (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02312048

DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2017.04.010

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().