La responsabilisation de la Société Générale. Normes juridiques et management dans le volet civil du procès Kerviel

Benoît Gérard and Oussama Ouriemmi
Additional contact information
Benoît Gérard: DRM - Dauphine Recherches en Management - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Oussama Ouriemmi: ISG - Institut supérieur de gestion - Université de Tunis

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The present article looks back to the judicial conflict between Société Générale and its former trader Jérôme Kerviel. More precisely, it starts from the juridical mutation that occurred in 2014 in the civil component of the case, in order to shed light on the final judicial decision that ensued. On September 23rd 2016, the Versailles Court of Appeals ruled Société Générale accountable under civil law, while confirming Kerviel as the sole guilty party under criminal law. The conflict is thereby used as an opportunity to explore the juridical norms pertaining to managerial norms and practices.

Keywords: judge; norms; management; juge; responsabilité sociétale des entreprises (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Published in Revue Française de Gestion, 2017, 43 (269), ⟨10.3166/rfg.2017.00201⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02379454

DOI: 10.3166/rfg.2017.00201

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().