Business valuation inspired by the Austrian school

Michael Olbrich, Tobias Quill and David J. Rapp ()
Additional contact information
Michael Olbrich: IWP - Institut für Wirtschaftsprüfung (Universität des Saarlandes - Saarland University)
Tobias Quill: IWP - Institut für Wirtschaftsprüfung (Universität des Saarlandes - Saarland University)
David J. Rapp: IWP - Institut für Wirtschaftsprüfung (Universität des Saarlandes - Saarland University)

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The significant failure rates observed in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) indicate structural deficiencies in business transactions. This paper identifies serious weaknesses in common valuation methods that play a key role in poor transaction practice. Common valuation methods are in particular discounted cash flow (DCF) methods. DCF methods are usually based on neo-classical theories that assume the existence of a perfect and complete capital market. As will be demonstrated, the underlying theoretical patchwork is contradictory and lacks utility. Therefore, utilizing DCF methods to value a business and deduce economic decisions from such a valuation is decision-making built on sand. Following a normative-deductive methodology, this paper seeks an alternative theoretical concept to build a business valuation theory on solid ground. Such an alternative is found in the Austrian School of thought. The resulting valuation concept, subjective business valuation theory, is based on the theory of marginal utility proposed by Gossen, which was rediscovered and refined by the scholars of the early Austrian School. Contrary to highly restrictive neo-classical valuation, subjective business valuation approaches reality and is therefore well-suited for practical implementation.

Keywords: Mergers and acquisitions (M&A); Marginal utility; Future earnings method (FEM); Discounted cash flow (DCF); Decision-making; Capital asset pricing model (CAPM) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Published in Journal of business valuation and economic loss analysis, 2015, 10 (1), pp.1 - 43. ⟨10.1515/jbvela-2014-0001⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02396880

DOI: 10.1515/jbvela-2014-0001

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().