Clusters and Regional Management Structures by Western MNCs in Asia: Overcoming the Distance Challenge

Bruno Amann (), Jacques Jaussaud and Johannes Schaaper
Additional contact information
Bruno Amann: IUT Paul Sabatier - Institut Universitaire de Technologie - Paul Sabatier - UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - UT - Université de Toulouse, LGC - Laboratoire de Gestion et de Cognition - UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - UT - Université de Toulouse
Johannes Schaaper: KEDGE Business School [Marseille], CREG - Centre de recherche et d'études en gestion - UPPA - Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Recent literature suggests that multinational companies pursue regional rather than global strategies. Therefore, this study investigates regional management structures, using French multinational companies (MNCs) in the Asia–Pacific region as an empirical context, to address two research questions: first, do MNCs split Asia into subregions and, if so, what are the resulting clusters of countries and clustering criteria? Second, what kind of regional management structures do MNCs establish in Asia, and what are their roles and functions? Factors, such as MNC size, the size of host markets, or the nature of their activities, might explain some differences. The authors conducted 77 face-to-face interviews with expatriated managers in charge of the subsidiaries or regional management structures of 47 French MNCs located in 11 countries in Asia, then crossed these data with secondary sources of information. Nearly half the MNCs subdivide the Asia–Pacific region into clusters of countries, where they locate regional management centres (regional headquarters, regional offices, distribution centres, local offices) with substantial functions and roles. The main drivers of a regional Asian strategy and organisation are the overall size of the MNC and its sales in Asia; the presence of manufacturing activities does not exert any influence. This research identifies ten clusters of countries in Asia, determined by the French MNCs in our sample, on the basis of four main criteria: market orientation/ economic logic, geographical and institutional proximity, cultural differences, and the MNC's own characteristics. Smaller MNCs do not slice Asia into clusters but rather centralise regional decisions and control procedures, implementing few regional management centres in Asia and giving them limited roles and functions.

Keywords: Multinational companies; Clusters; Regional management centres; Subsidiaries; Regional organisation; Autonomy; Control; Asia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014-12
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (9)

Published in MIR: Management International Review, 2014, 54 (6), pp.879-906. ⟨10.1007/s11575-014-0222-7⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Clusters and Regional Management Structures by Western MNCs in Asia: Overcoming the Distance Challenge (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02431084

DOI: 10.1007/s11575-014-0222-7

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().