The reign of the shareholder value under the rise of the fair value convention
Nihel Chabrak () and
Ines Bouden ()
Additional contact information
Nihel Chabrak: IMT-BS - DEFI - Département Droit, Économie et Finances - TEM - Télécom Ecole de Management - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] - IMT-BS - Institut Mines-Télécom Business School - IMT - Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris]
Ines Bouden: CREFIGE - Centre Européen de Recherche en Finance et Gestion - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
Associated with neo-liberalism, shareholder value stands accused of being at the origin of the financialisation of the economy which has precipitated the current financial crisis. Indoctrinated by the precepts of positive economics, accountants set themselves the target of total disclosure to investors to ensure the efficient functioning of financial markets instead of broadening accountability to other stakeholders. The IASB project is in line with this logic. The introduction of the fair value convention contributed to the widespread acceptance of the principle of governance by markets. In order to limit the impact of the crisis on global economies, the IASB published in October 2008 an educational guidance on the application of fair value measurement when markets become inactive. Instead of reforming this convention yet criticized by many professionals and academics in the past, this amendment amounts to an argument that the shareholder value concept is not responsible for the crisis, and that henceforth the financial reporting requirements of listed institutions to the market should be decoupled from the prudential requirements of financial institutions as required by the regulator. This answer contributes to maintaining the status quo and the primacy of the shareholder value as corporate governance model. More problematic is the fact that by its action, the IASB is abolishing the sacred principle of conservatism.
Date: 2010-05-19
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in EURAM 2010 : 10th European Academy of Management Annual Conference, May 2010, Rome, Italy
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02439580
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().