Fair Trade and justice: a comment on Walton and Deneulin
Jerome Ballet and
Delphine Pouchain
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
In this article we first point out that the different conceptualisations of Fair Trade, which are sometimes analytically contradictory, actually form a coordinated set. Understanding the Fair Trade project is impossible without taking these interlinked conceptualisations into consideration. Second, this set basically forms a mechanism of structural, institutional and moral reforms that guide actions. In this way Fair Trade sets out to produce less injustice than is usually the case with the structures and institutions that govern conventional trade. Nevertheless, it does not try to define what a just society is or even to perfectly define ‘fair trade'. This implies the adoption of a comparative justice angle. It is precisely by linking comparative individual situations with the structures that produce these situations that relative justice can find its strength and purpose.
Keywords: sustainability; international trade; poverty; corporate social responsibility and fair trade; corporate strategy; justice; livelihoods and sustainability; poverty and inequality; social justice; social movement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Published in Third World Quarterly, In press, 36 (8), pp.1421-1436. ⟨10.1080/01436597.2015.1042968⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
Journal Article: Fair Trade and justice: a comment on Walton and Deneulin (2015) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02481662
DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2015.1042968
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().