Zipf's Law and Canadian Urban Growth

Aurelie Lalanne
Additional contact information
Aurelie Lalanne: GREThA - Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée - UB - Université de Bordeaux - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to study the hierarchical structure of the Canadian urban system and to determine the growth processes. Zipf's law is rejected for the whole country for all periods because of a clear size-domination by a few big cities such as Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver. It appears that the dynamics of growth follow a deterministic process related to existing urban size, previous growth and spatial structure. Splitting the Canadian urban system into two-east and west-permits the identification of differences that were not observable when studying the country as a whole. While size and previous growth are still important explanatory variables of growth patterns, these two systems may be distinguished one from the other from the point of view of spatial patterns of distribution of growth rates.

Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Published in Urban Studies, In press, 51 (8), pp.1725-1740. ⟨10.1177/0042098013498623⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02483992

DOI: 10.1177/0042098013498623

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().