On the Acceptability of the Ambient Tax Mechanism: An Experimental Investigation

Kene Boun My (), Francois Cochard () and Anthony Ziegelmeyer
Additional contact information
Francois Cochard: LERNA - Economie des Ressources Naturelles - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - CEA - Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives
Anthony Ziegelmeyer: Max Planck Institute of Economics - Max-Planck-Gesellschaft

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Regulation of non-point emission problems such as pesticide and nitrogen pollution of lakesand ground water is a major policy challenge. The emissions-based instruments that economistsusually advocate for cost-effective pollution control are not feasible since emissions are unobserv-able. Among the policy instruments suggested by the theoretical literature on non-point manage-ment, the tax schemes applied to ambient concentrations ("ambient taxes" for short) have drawnparticular interest. While the relative efficiency of ambient based taxes has been demonstratedexperimentally, the instrument may raise serious acceptability problems. In particular, individualswho take costly actions to improve their environmental performance could find themselves subjectto larger rather than smaller penalties due to environmental shirking on the part of others. Ourobjective in this paper is to assess the acceptability of the ambient tax. Concretely, we ask subjectsto choose between (A) an ambient tax and (B) an individual tax system. In case (A), they actuallyparticipate in a game in which their payoff depends on all participants' decisions and on naturalvariability as would be the case in the real world if an ambient tax was implemented. In case(B) they simply earn a sure payoff, which is supposed to reflect their maximal profit under theindividual tax system. We take the percentage of agents preferring the ambient tax to a given surepayoff level as an indicator of the acceptability of the ambient tax given this sure payoff level. Ourexperimental results mitigate the common belief that ambient taxes are totally unacceptable. Ifthe "sure" alternative to the ambient tax policy is very costly for the polluters, for example becauseit involves high inspection costs, polluters might eventually prefer being liable to an ambient tax.

Keywords: Nonpoint Source Pollution; Group Decision Making; Experiments; Acceptability of fiscal instruments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Published in SSRN : Social Science Research Network, 2007, pp.1-20. ⟨10.2139/ssrn.1029620⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Working Paper: On the Acceptability of the Ambient Tax Mechanism: An Experimental Investigation (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02510675

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1029620

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().