A political ideology lens on social entrepreneurship motivations
Janice Byrne (),
Sylvain Bureau () and
Halima Jarrodi
Additional contact information
Janice Byrne: LEM - Lille économie management - UMR 9221 - UA - Université d'Artois - UCL - Université catholique de Lille - Université de Lille - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
The traditional literature regarding social entrepreneurship does not question the political dimension. On the contrary, it tends to de-politicize societal issues. A growing number of researchers underline how this perspective cannot address the complexity and the dialogical nature of social entrepreneurship. However, while there may be a case for incorporating a political perspective, there is currently no conceptual framework to systematically inform an empirical exploration of the role played by the political vision of entrepreneurs. In this paper, we use the concept of political ideology to offer a solid framework to show how politics can shape social entrepreneurs' motivations. More precisely we identify three political profiles – anti-statist, reformist and neoliberal – which shape the motives to engage in social entrepreneurship. We take an embedded case study approach of 17 social entrepreneurs involved in a social innovation boot camp and reveal the existence of both, left and right-wing approaches in social entrepreneurship.
Keywords: Social entrepreneurship; political ideology; entrepreneurs’ motivations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019-04-09
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)
Published in Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 2019, 31 (7-8), pp.583-604. ⟨10.1080/08985626.2019.1596353⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02512028
DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2019.1596353
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().