Les expérimentations aléatoires, le « gold standard » des méthodes d’évaluation d’impact ?

Arthur Jatteau ()

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: By randomly sampling the recipients of the public policies they study, randomized controlled trials allow the effects of these policies to be assessed and are considered by many economists as a gold standard. However, they are subject to multiple limitations, which weaken their validity and call for a wider use of mixed empirical designs that include qualitative methods.

Date: 2018-01-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Published in Regards croisés sur l'économie, 2018, Regards croisés sur l'économie, 22 (1), ⟨10.3917/rce.022.0184⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02569475

DOI: 10.3917/rce.022.0184

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().