 Do european agri-environment measures help reduce herbicide use? Evidence from viticulture in FranceLaure Kuhfuss and Julie Subervie Post-Print from HAL Abstract: Agri-environmental schemes (AES) are a central component of the European environmental policy, but few of these schemes have been carefully evaluated and doubts are often expressed about their effectiveness. We use original data collected from winegrowers who participated in an AES targeting non-point source pollution from herbicides in 2011 and 2012 in the South region of France. Using the variation in the implementation of the scheme across time and space and a matching approach, we show that the quantity of herbicides used by participants in the scheme in 2011 ranges from 38 to 53 \% below what they would have used without the scheme and this percentage is between 42 and 50 \% in 2012. Further, our results suggest that least demanding AES options are effective in avoiding pollution peaks when weed pressure is high, whereas more demanding AES options guarantee an overall reduction in herbicide use, even during relatively easy farming years in which less weed pressure is experienced. Keywords: payments for environmental services; water quality; herbicides; treatment effect; agri-environmental scheme; nonpoint source pollution; pesticides (search for similar items in EconPapers) Published in Ecological Economics, 2018, 179, pp.202-211. ⟨10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.015⟩ There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it. Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02623193 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.015 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Post-Print from HAL |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.