EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Validation of a method using queenless Bombus terrestris micro-colonies for testing the nutritive value of commercial pollen mixes by comparison with queenright colonies

Jean Noel Tasei and Pierrick Aupinel ()
Additional contact information
Jean Noel Tasei: Laboratoire de recherches de zoologie - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique
Pierrick Aupinel: ENTOMOLOGIE - Entomologie - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The nutritive value of pollen blends purchased by humble bee producers from bee-keepers is a key factor of successful mass rearing. We have already devised a method for quality ranking of pollen diets, It was a 1-mo bioassay using queenless micro-colonies of three callow workers (Bombus terrestris L.; Apidae: Bombinae). In the current study, we tested three pollen diets through the micro-colony method and compared the results to the development of queenright colonies supplied with the same diets. The three diets were "A," a spring blend with a protein rate of 15.7% and a dominance of Corylus avellana L. (46%) and Buxus sempervivens L. (35%), "B," it summer assemblage with a lower crude protein content (14.4%), with a dominance of Helianthus annuns L. (37%), Zea mays L. (35%), and Poaceae (21%); and "C," a 50/50 mixture by weight of A and B, with a crude protein content of 15.8%. In micro-colonies, the more sensitive parameter for diet ranking was the mean weight of it larva, whereas in (queenright colonies, the discrimination between treatments was enabled by considering the body size of new queens (weight and length of the radial cell) and the slope of the sigmoidal curve of the pollen consumption at the inflection point reflecting brood growth. Both testing methods assigned the lower rank to diet B compared with diet A. Despite the closeness of the three diets in terms of nitrogen content, we concluded that micro-colonies were a good estimate of colony development when nutritive value of pollen was tested.

Keywords: BOMBUS TERRESTRIS; COMPARATIVE BIOASSAY; BUMBLE BEE; COLONY DEVELOPMENT; POLLEN DIET; POLLEN CONSUMPTION; NUTRITIVE VALUE; NUTRITION; ELEVAGE DE REINES (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of Economic Entomology, 2008, 101 (6), pp.1737-1742

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02659248

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02659248