Institutions, Rule-Following and Conditional Reasoning

Cyril Hédoin

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This paper is a contribution to the advancement of a naturalistic social ontology. Individuals participate in an institutionalized practice by following rules. In this perspective, I show that the nature, the stability, and the dynamics of any institution depend on how people reason about states of affairs that do not occur. That means that counterfactual reasoning is essential in the working of institutions. I present arguments for the importance of counterfactuals as well as a game-theoretic framework to account for them. Since the role of counterfactuals does not directly transpire in people's behavior, the whole discussion can be seen as a broad argument against behaviorism in philosophy and the social sciences.

Date: 2019-02
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of Institutional Economics, 2019, 15 (1), pp.1-25. ⟨10.1017/S1744137418000073⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
Journal Article: Institutions, rule-following and conditional reasoning (2019)
Working Paper: Institutions, Rule-Following and Conditional Reasoning (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02865573

DOI: 10.1017/S1744137418000073

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().