The Convention on biological diversity

Valerie Boisvert and Franck-Dominique Vivien ()
Additional contact information
Valerie Boisvert: GRED - Gouvernance, Risque, Environnement, Développement - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - IRD [Occitanie] - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - Montpellier SupAgro - Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The erosion of biological diversity pertains to the category of problems that are brought to the fore in ddebated universesT.There are scientific controversies about their definition, import and possible solutions and they involve opposing economicinterests and political strategies. A dconventionT–commonly shared values, set of definitions, rules and norms–implying acompromise among various actors and groups is needed to define and enforce policies. The Convention on biological diversitycan be seen as an attempt to define such a middle ground. The rights and policy orientations it promotes are however challengedby overlapping norms and rules enacted in other arenas, such as the WTO. The purpose of this paper is to take up aconventionalist stance on the complex international regime that governs biodiversity management and conservation policies.

Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Joan Martinez-Alier; Inge Røpke. Recent developments in ecological economics, E. Elgar Publishing, pp.439-450, 2008

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02874454

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().