Nationalization of real estate property in the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine: some legal aspect of protection of civil right

Anatoliy Kostruba ()

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The article reveals the mechanism of the right termination of proprietary relations in consequence of the adoption of the act of nationalization of property . The author makes attempt to solve the problem of civil protection of the right of ownership of the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine from illegal encroachments on the part of the relevant local government area. The analysis of the civil legislation of the Russian Federation on the issues is investigated. It is proved that in matters of protection of the property rights it is advisable to use the legal means by the principle of «reverse procedural activity». Its meaning is to use the mechanism of protection of the rights provided for by the national legislation of the Russian Federation, along with the laws of Ukraine.

Keywords: nationalization; property law; property relations; right termination of proprietary relations; temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine; temporarily occupied territory; legal facts (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015-07-17
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02895661
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Kieller Ostrechts-Notizen, 2015, Rechtliche Aspekte der Eingliederung der Halbinsel Krim in der Russische Föderation im Jahr 2014, 18/19 (2/2014-1/2015), pp.22-28

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-02895661/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02895661

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().