Chief happiness officer: What does this position bring to well-being at the workplace?
Chief Happiness Officer: quelles contributions au bien-être en entreprise ?
Sabrina Tanquerel () and
Roland Condor ()
Additional contact information
Sabrina Tanquerel: Métis Lab EM Normandie - EM Normandie - École de Management de Normandie = EM Normandie Business School
Roland Condor: Métis Lab EM Normandie - EM Normandie - École de Management de Normandie = EM Normandie Business School
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
The interest and controversy spawned by the creation of a "chief happiness officer" (CHO) lead to asking how this position will actually contribute to well-being at the workplace. Is the CHO a "gadget", or does this position signal an actual advance toward improving well-being in firms ? Answers to this question are based on an analysis of the literature on well-being at the workplace and on a qualitative study of CHOs (or their equivalent). Although CHOs are recruited in an effort to improve hedonistic well-being and foster horizontal management, appointing a CHO has little to do with the pursuit of happiness (eudemonic well-being). Some CHOs are recruited for utilitarian purposes, but this might undermine any contribution they make to well-being in the long run. The contribution to well-being made by appointing a CHO falls short and has to be completed with other arrangements.
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in Gérer et Comprendre. Annales des Mines, 2020, 140, pp.5-18. ⟨10.3917/geco1.140.0005⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02901482
DOI: 10.3917/geco1.140.0005
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().