Commons as a risk-management tool: theoretical predictions and an experimental test
Marielle Brunette (),
Philippe Delacote,
Serge Garcia and
Jean-Marc Rousselle ()
Additional contact information
Jean-Marc Rousselle: CEE-M - Centre d'Economie de l'Environnement - Montpellier - UM - Université de Montpellier - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro - Montpellier SupAgro - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Post-Print from HAL
Abstract:
Common-pool resources (CPR) are frequently used as risk-management tools against risk on private activities. The impact of this safety-net use of CPR on the individual investment into and extraction from the commons is analyzed in this paper. Agents of the community first choose to invest in their private project and in the CPR; second, they choose how much to extract from their private project and the commons. The model compares two types of risk-management tool: CPR as (ex post) risk-coping and (ex ante) risk-diversification mechanisms. It also compares two situations regarding risk: risk on a private project and uncertainty on CPR investment by other community members. The theoretical predictions are empirically tested with experimental economics. To this end, we propose an original CPR game composed of an investment period and an extraction period. Our result clearly shows that risk reduction in the private project unambiguously decreases investment in the CPR, while it does not impact CPR extraction. We also show that a risk-coping strategy is well understood as more flexible and influenced by the outcome in terms of private project yield.
Keywords: deforestation; experimental economics; common-pool resource; common-pool resource game; risk (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020-07-20
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Published in Revue d'économie politique, 2020, 130, pp.405-439. ⟨10.3917/redp.303.0405⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
Journal Article: Commons as a Risk-Management Tool: Theoretical Predictions and an Experimental Test (2020) 
Working Paper: Commons as a risk-management tool: theoretical predictions and an experimental test (2014) 
Working Paper: Commons as a risk-management tool: theoretical predictions and an experimental test (2012) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02904082
DOI: 10.3917/redp.303.0405
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().