Les justifications empiriques de la compensation financière après divorce
Bruno Jeandidier () and
Post-Print from HAL
This article consists of a wide-ranging review of the international empirical literature, the aim being to show the extent to which there is an empirical (statistical) basis for payment of a compensatory allowance between former spouses after divorce. Two factors are primarily examined in light of that literature: first, the fact that the allowance is conditional on inequality between the standards of living enjoyed by the former spouses at the time of the divorce, and second, the fact that regard can be had to the previous occupational choices of the former spouses in calculating the allowance. Our analysis shows that while the empirical literature is in relatively broad agreement on the question of inequality in the standard of living, the empirical justification for the connection between compensation and previous occupational choices, on the other hand, is considerably less widely recognized.
Keywords: Divorce; Compensation financière (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-02978209
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Published in Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société, Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2016, 31 (02), pp.183-202. ⟨10.1017/cls.2016.17⟩
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02978209
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().