Management Innovation and Open Innovation: For and Towards Dialogue

Cécile Ayerbe (), Sandra Dubouloz, Sophie Mignon () and Marc Robert ()
Additional contact information
Cécile Ayerbe: GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UniCA - Université Côte d'Azur
Sandra Dubouloz: IREGE - Institut de Recherche en Gestion et en Economie - USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry] - Université Savoie Mont Blanc
Sophie Mignon: MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School - UM - Université de Montpellier
Marc Robert: MRM - Montpellier Research in Management - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - UPVD - Université de Perpignan Via Domitia - Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School - UM - Université de Montpellier

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This paper shows the full relevance of having a closerdialogue between the literatures on OI and MI thanis currently the case.Some encouraging and extremely interesting results have been reportedby MI research using the OI paradigm, and research on the organizationallevel of OI which echoes the MI literature. In particular, the literature on MI has examined the role of knowledge, experience and external agents in an outside-in perspective. The areas covered byMIresearch call for integration of the OI paradigm into the fieldof MI, to give ‘Open Management innovation'. In parallel, the literature on OI has called for reflection on organizationaldesign, structures, managerial practices in general and HR management in particular in order to manageopenness. However, the links highlighted remain weak, and the number of studies is low. Also, the summary proposedhere has shown their limitations and the need for replication or further investigation. Closer connections or a dialogue between the two fields of innovation management appears to be more than relevant and appropriate for their mutual enrichment. This studyhas identified promising and necessary research perspectives. More systematic discussions between these two communities could extend their respective boundaries and pave the wayfor a more integrative approach. This would give us an understanding of theconditions in which OI and MI respectively lead to other types of innovations, and what those types are, and in return how they feed and reinvent themselves in a recursive loop process.

Date: 2020
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-sbm
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02985953v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Published in Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 2020, Managerial Innovation and Open Innovation Strategies, 32, pp.13-41. ⟨10.3917/jie.032.0013⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-02985953v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02985953

DOI: 10.3917/jie.032.0013

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().