Profit Vs. Not-for-Profit: Logistics Service Providers (LSP) and Humanitarian relief

Diego Vega (), Christine Roussat () and Nathalie Fabbe-Costes ()
Additional contact information
Diego Vega: Hanken School of Economics, HUMLOG Institute - Hanken School of Economics
Christine Roussat: IUT d'Allier - IUT d'Allier - UCA [2017-2020] - Université Clermont Auvergne [2017-2020], CRET-LOG - Centre de Recherche sur le Transport et la Logistique - AMU - Aix Marseille Université
Nathalie Fabbe-Costes: CRET-LOG - Centre de Recherche sur le Transport et la Logistique - AMU - Aix Marseille Université

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Purpose: Logistics outsourcing recently spread to humanitarian supply chains. Academics thus began to explore the emergence of LSPs in the field: commercial or humanitarian organizations (HOs). Authors point out that outsourcing improves the delivery of goods, the logistics capabilities of HOs, while reducing risks. However, previous works failed to distinguish Not-for-Profit from commercial contracts in humanitarian logistics. Our research seeks to refine and expand the role that LSPs play in humanitarian supply chains based on Vega and Roussat's (2015) conceptualization and further Sigala and Wakolbinger's (2019) partial validation. Research Approach: Our exploratory research is a qualitative endeavor, following abductive reasoning process and using a ‘systematic combining' approach. Based on an interview guide built upon an extensive literature review, we conducted interviews with LSP identified as major players in humanitarian relief among which Kuehne + Nagel, DHL, Agility, Damco. For each company, we interviewed a contract manager or the head of Aid SBU (when it exists) and the CSR manager. The interviews were transcribed and coded using a QDAS (NVivo) in order to ensure internal validity. Findings and Originality: First results reveal a huge diversity of situations. The prices for logistics services can go from usual commercial tariffs to pre-fixed rates negotiated on a periodic basis. Some firms use open book policies, propose price reductions or finally provide services pro-bono. The research also identifies levers justifying the choice of the pricing politics. Surprisingly, humanitarian logistics is clearly considered as a business unit, independent of CSR commitments Research Impact: Our research contributes to the growing trend of research on humanitarian logistics as a service. Focusing on the characteristics of the relation between LSPs and HOs helps to clarify the public-private relationships and the conditions of service providing, thus completing recent works. Practical Impact: Results can help HOs understanding LSPs' decision process and both partners better grasping the other's mindset.

Date: 2020-09-09
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in e-LRN Special Web Conference, Cardiff Business School (U.K.), Sep 2020, Cardiff, United Kingdom

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03029634

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().