Why does birthplace matter so much?

Clement Bosquet and Henry Overman

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: We consider the link between birthplace and wages. Using a unique panel dataset, we estimate a raw elasticity of wages with respect to birthplace size of 4.2%, two thirds of the 6.8% raw elasticity with respect to city size. Part of this effect simply reflects intergenerational transmission and the spatial sorting of parents, part is explained by the role that birthplace size plays in determining current city size. Lifetime immobility explains a lot of the correlation between birthplace and current city size: we show that 43.7% of individuals only ever work while living in the place they were born. Our results highlight the importance of intergenerational and individual sorting in helping explain the persistence of spatial disparities.

Date: 2019-03
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03193933
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (26)

Published in Journal of Urban Economics, 2019, 110, pp.26-34. ⟨10.1016/j.jue.2019.01.003⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-03193933/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Why does birthplace matter so much? (2019)
Working Paper: Why does birthplace matter so much? (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03193933

DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2019.01.003

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().