Mill versus Jevons on traditional sexual division of labour: Is gender equality efficient?

Virginie Gouverneur

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The question of the legitimacy of traditional sexual division of labour receives growing attention from contemporary economists. In particular, a debate takes place between the "New Home Economics", which stresses the efficiency of the traditional arrangement and economists questioning the justice of the relations between sexes. The same kind of opposition appears between two Victorian economists: J.S. Mill and W.S. Jevons. Although both are utilitarian, they adopt contrary views about the relative importance of efficiency and justice in the definition of appropriate gender relations. While Mill aims at conciliating justice and utility, Jevons considers that utility outweighs justice.

Keywords: John Stuart Mill; William Stanley Jevons; Traditional sexual division of labour; Efficiency; Justice (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013-10
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published in European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2013, 20 (5), pp.741-775. ⟨10.1080/09672567.2011.653883⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03197585

DOI: 10.1080/09672567.2011.653883

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD (hal@ccsd.cnrs.fr).