EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

When Can a Disability Quota System Empower Disabled Individuals in the Workplace? The Case of France

Sarah Richard and Sophie Hennekam
Additional contact information
Sarah Richard: EM Strasbourg - École de Management de Strasbourg = EM Strasbourg Business School
Sophie Hennekam: Audencia Business School

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: This study uses an empowerment theory perspective to examine how a disability quota system affects the decision to disclose one's disability at work. The study reports on 39 life story interviews with disabled individuals who recently entered or were seeking to enter the labour market in France. The study shows that when considering the disclosure decision, disabled workers reflect on personal attributes, such as their educational level, the visibility of their disability and whether they need workplace adaptations; on the organisational environment, such as the organisation's commitment to diversity; and on the legal context (underpinned by the biopsychosocial model), in this case, the quota system. These reflections determine whether the disabled workers perceive their disability status as a valuable attribute and whether legal disclosure can be empowering. This study proposes a nuanced perspective by highlighting both the system's potential for empowerment and for propagating inequality among disabled workers.

Date: 2020-11
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03232751
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Work, Employment and Society, 2020, pp.095001702094667. ⟨10.1177/0950017020946672⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-03232751/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03232751

DOI: 10.1177/0950017020946672

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03232751