Increasing Leverage

Patrick Le Bihan () and Nicholas Almendares
Additional contact information
Nicholas Almendares: Tulane University

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Although judicial review is used to police constitutional boundaries, the practice raises serious democratic concerns because unelected judges can overrule the decisions of political majorities. Using an agency model we show that judicial review has a heretofore unacknowledged democracy-enhancing effect. By constraining the policy choices made by elected representatives, judicial review increases the importance of office benefits as compared to policy benefits, making it more likely that politicians behave in the voters' best interests. Politicians do so across policy issues, including those that courts cannot review, leading to a spillover effect. These effects do not depend on the preferences of the court, nor on the courts' decisions being observed by the voters. The overall impact judicial review has on democracy is ambiguous, however, because this democracy-enhancing effect comes at the expense of turning some policies over to the courts. We suggest that this ambiguity can be resolved in favor of democracy by tailoring the courts' jurisdiction or standards of review.

Keywords: Judicial; review (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 2015, 10 (3), pp.357 - 390. ⟨10.1561/100.00013147_app⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03292147

DOI: 10.1561/100.00013147_app

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().