Les impacts d’une évaluation bibliométrique standardisée: le cas des publications de sciences sociales au sein d’une section universitaire multidisciplinaire

Bastien Soulé ()
Additional contact information
Bastien Soulé: L-VIS - Laboratoire sur les Vulnérabilités et l'Innovation dans le Sport (EA 7428) - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: In France, Hcéres has been placing impact bibliometrics at the heart of the evaluation process of sports sciences (STAPS) research units since 2018. This article sets out to analyze the effects of this shift in the valuation of social science productions, during laboratory evaluations as well as on the scholarly practices of the players involved. The evaluation reports of six laboratories as well as twelve interviews with teacher-researchers show that the new guide to the products of research profoundly alters their activity. It is applied with a zeal that reinforces the centrality of SCImago Journal Ranking, which has become a normative tool of appraisal. The teacher-researchers concerned are developing dual strategies in order to cope with these new requirements while also giving themselves alternative spaces for expression and recognition.

Keywords: evaluation; France; research; social sciences; STAPS; évaluation; recherche; sciences sociales (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Nouveaux cahiers de la recherche en éducation, 2020, 22 (3)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03315919

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().