Comparison of two estimation methods based on the FADN

Comparaison de deux méthodes d'estimation sur la base du RICA

Dominique Desbois ()

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The microeconomic analysis of agricultural production costs, whether retrospective or prospective, is a tool for analysing net margins, and thus makes it possible to assess is a tool for analysing net margins, and thus makes it possible to assess the competitiveness of farmers, one of the farmers, one of the major elements in the development or maintenance of agri-food sectors in European in European regions. This paper compares two methods of estimating agricultural production costs from microeconomic data of the Farm Accountancy Data Network: the "Seemingly Unrelated Regression" (SUR) method and the "Partial Least Squares" (PLS) method, according to three criteria (the correlation of the estimates, the coefficient of determination, the mean square deviation).

Date: 2002-12-16
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03319858v1
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in 8è Journées de Méthodologie Statistique de l'Insee, INSEE, Dec 2002, Paris, France

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03319858v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03319858

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().