Residential mobility to the rural and peri-urban areas: a segregative process?

Migration résidentielle vers le rural et le périurbain: un processus ségrégatif ?

Cécile Batisse (), Stéphanie Truchet () and Nong Zhu ()
Additional contact information
Cécile Batisse: CERDI - Centre d'Études et de Recherches sur le Développement International - IRD - Institut de Recherche pour le Développement - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UCA - Université Clermont Auvergne
Stéphanie Truchet: Territoires - Territoires - AgroParisTech - VAS - VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - UCA - Université Clermont Auvergne
Nong Zhu: INRS-UCS - Urbanisation Culture Société - INRS - INRS - Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique [Québec]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: In France, migratory flows between rural and urban areas have gradually reversed over the past decades, leading to a phenomenon of counter-urbanization. Nevertheless, this migration dynamic appears contrasted and there is a socio-demographic differentiation of residential flows to rural areas. So that migrations could modify socio-demographic composition and increase inequalities between territories. The present study aims to examine the link between residential migration to rural and peri-urban areas and socio-spatial segregation. Using data from 2014 population census aggregated at the catchment area level, we analyze the impacts of territories' characteristics on migratory flows to rural and peri-urban areas. According to our econometric results, individuals are sensitive to sociodemographic characteristics of neighborhood in their places of origin and destination. First, human capital is a retention force at origin place and a pull force at destination place. Second, migrants are less attracted by rural and periurban areas with greater social heterogeneity in terms of education and this push effect is reinforced by high share of executives in the population. Third, we observe a differentiation in migratory flows according to socio-professional groups. Indeed, while social heterogeneity at origin place constitutes a retention factor for executives, it constitutes a push factor for workers and employees. Likewise, whilst migrants mainly flock to areas where median tax income is lower, when migration occurs between rural areas, the executives prefer areas with higher income level, which could lead to rural gentrification. Thus, our study suggest that residential migration towards rural and periurban areas could lead to a concentration of people with similar socio-demographic characteristics.

Keywords: Migration; Rural and periurban areas; Socio-spatial Segregation; Espaces ruraux et périurbains; Ségrégation socio-spatiale (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-04-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-des and nep-ure
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03321165v1
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, 2021, Avril (2), pp.197-224. ⟨10.3917/reru.212.0197⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-03321165v1/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03321165

DOI: 10.3917/reru.212.0197

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().