De l’intérêt égoïste à l’empathie: vers de nouveaux fondements pour l’économie politique ?

Emmanuel Blanc ()
Additional contact information
Emmanuel Blanc: TRIANGLE - Triangle : action, discours, pensée politique et économique - ENS de Lyon - École normale supérieure de Lyon - Université de Lyon - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - IEP Lyon - Sciences Po Lyon - Institut d'études politiques de Lyon - Université de Lyon - UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The article attempts to show that the concept of sympathy, taken from Adam Smith's Theory of Moral Sentiments, allows us to distinguish between the purely egoistic interest (‘selfishness') of the homo oeconomicus theories (which we describe as ‘autistic') and an interest in oneself (‘self-love'), which stems from a sympathy towards ourselves (‘reflexive sympathy') built from the sympathy we feel towards the other (‘direct sympathy') and from the other towards us (‘reciprocal sympathy'). Interest, in the sense of self-love, by being part of the loops of sympathy, allows us to get out of the theoretical deadlocks that we can find in some authors of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, including those already criticised by Smith : Mandeville, Hume, Hutcheson, and Hobbes, the one on whom we are focusing. We then broaden our analysis by relying on the recent discoveries of mirror neurons which enable us to explain empathy (a concept very close to Smithian ‘sympathy') in humans as well as in the great apes. As empathy now has an indisputable neurological basis, it allows us to confirm our critique of the standard economic theories of homo oeconomicus and to contemplate a re-foundation of political economy.

Keywords: sympathie; empathie; intérêt égoïste; self-love; selfishness; économie politique; homo economicus; modèles économiques; passions; raison; neurones miroirs; Smith (Adam); Hobbes (Thomas) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-09-06
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Published in Journal of interdisciplinary history of ideas, 2021, Journal of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas, 10 (19), ⟨10.13135/2280-8574/4449⟩

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03338086

DOI: 10.13135/2280-8574/4449

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().