Identifying how GPs spend their time and the obstacles they face: a mixed-methods study

Carol Sinnott, Jordan M Moxey, Sonja Marjanovic, Brandi Leach, Lucy Hocking, Sarah Ball, Alexandros Georgiadis, Guillaume Lamé (guillaume.lame@centralesupelec.fr), Janet Willars and Mary Dixon-Woods
Additional contact information
Carol Sinnott: Institute of Public Health - Department of Public Health and Primary Care [Cambridge, UK] - CAM - University of Cambridge [UK]
Jordan M Moxey: Institute of Public Health - Department of Public Health and Primary Care [Cambridge, UK] - CAM - University of Cambridge [UK]
Sonja Marjanovic: RAND Europe [Cambridge]
Brandi Leach: RAND Europe [Cambridge]
Lucy Hocking: RAND Europe [Cambridge]
Sarah Ball: RAND Europe [Cambridge]
Alexandros Georgiadis: Institute of Public Health - Department of Public Health and Primary Care [Cambridge, UK] - CAM - University of Cambridge [UK]
Guillaume Lamé: CAM - University of Cambridge [UK], LGI - Laboratoire Génie Industriel - CentraleSupélec - Université Paris-Saclay, Institute of Public Health - Department of Public Health and Primary Care [Cambridge, UK] - CAM - University of Cambridge [UK]
Janet Willars: Department of Health Sciences [Leicester] - University of Leicester
Mary Dixon-Woods: Institute of Public Health - Department of Public Health and Primary Care [Cambridge, UK] - CAM - University of Cambridge [UK]

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Background: Although problems that impair task completion — known as operational failures — are an important focus of concern in primary care, they have remained little studied. Aim: To quantify the time GPs spend on different activities during clinical sessions; to identify the number of operational failures they encounter; and to characterise the nature of operational failures and their impact for GPs. Design and setting: Mixed-method triangulation study with 61 GPs in 28 NHS general practices in England from December 2018 to December 2019. Method: Time–motion methods, ethnographic observations, and interviews were used. Results: Time–motion data on 7679 GP tasks during 238 hours of practice in 61 clinical sessions suggested that operational failures were responsible for around 5.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.5% to 5.4%) of all tasks undertaken by GPs and accounted for 3.9% (95% CI = 3.2% to 4.5%) of clinical time. However, qualitative data showed that time–motion methods, which depend on pre-programmed categories, substantially underestimated operational failures. Qualitative data also enabled further characterisation of operational failures, extending beyond those measured directly in the time–motion data (for example, interruptions, deficits in equipment/supplies, and technology) to include problems linked to GPs' coordination role and weaknesses in work systems and processes. The impacts of operational failures were highly consequential for GPs' experiences of work. Conclusion: GPs experience frequent operational failures, disrupting patient care, impairing experiences of work, and imposing burden in an already pressurised system. This better understanding of the nature and impact of operational failures allows for identification of targets for improvement and indicates the need for coordinated action to support GPs.

Keywords: ethnography; general practice; mixed methods; operational failures; time and motion studies; operations research (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-02
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03371987
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in British Journal of General Practice, 2022, 72 (715), pp.e148-e160. ⟨10.3399/BJGP.2021.0357⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-03371987/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03371987

DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0357

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD (hal@ccsd.cnrs.fr).