"Not tested on animals": How consumers react to cruelty-free cosmetics proposed by manufacturers and retailers?

Cindy Grappe, Cindy Lombart, Didier Louis () and Fabien Durif
Additional contact information
Cindy Grappe: UQAM - Université du Québec à Montréal = University of Québec in Montréal
Cindy Lombart: Audencia Recherche - Audencia Business School
Didier Louis: IUT Saint-Nazaire - Institut Universitaire de Technologie Saint-Nazaire - UN - Université de Nantes
Fabien Durif: UQAM - Université du Québec à Montréal = University of Québec in Montréal

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: Purpose-Animal welfare is increasingly favoured by consumers in their choice of food and cosmetic products, proposed by manufacturers and retailers. This study aims to investigate the impact of the "not tested on animals" claim on consumers' attitude and behavioural intention towards a cosmetic product through an enriched version of Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behaviour. Design/methodology/approach-A between-subjects design has been used. 450 participants were recruited through the social network of a cosmetics and personal hygiene brand in Quebec, Canada, and answered a questionnaire. They were randomly assigned to either a manipulation group (n=226) or a control group (n=224). Data were analysed with Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling. Findings-This study shows that external (credibility and attitude towards marketing claims) and internal psychological variables (subjective norms and altruistic concerns with animal welfare) influence attitude towards and purchase intention of "not tested on animals" personal care products. More egotistic concerns, such as personal appearance, also explain the formation of attitude towards cruelty-free cosmetics. Research limitations/implications-This research supplements Ajzen's original model with internal psychological (individuals' concerns with animal welfare and personal appearance) and external (general credibility of cosmetic products claims, credibility of the "not tested on animals" claim and attitude towards this claim) variables. These variables, as suggested by previous research on cosmetics and their claims, improve the understanding of consumer attitude and purchase behaviour patterns. Practical implications-The study's findings point out the role of companies to increase consumers' knowledge on the significance and transparency of their messages, notably the "not tested on animals" claim. They also stress that policymakers in regions where regulation is unclear should at least punish untruthful communication pertaining to animal testing in cosmetic and personal care products. Originality/value-Prior studies on cosmetic products did not investigate the difference of consumer attitude formation towards cruelty-free products compared to conventional cosmetic products. Consequently, this research shows that the construction of attitude towards crueltyfree products highly differs from conventional personal care.

Date: 2021-05-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mkt
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://audencia.hal.science/hal-03379593
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Published in International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 2021, 49 (11), pp.1532-1553. ⟨10.1108/IJRDM-12-2020-0489⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://audencia.hal.science/hal-03379593/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03379593

DOI: 10.1108/IJRDM-12-2020-0489

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().