Is the study of business-cycle fluctuations 'scientific'?

Edouard Challe

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: The study of macroeconomic fluctuations assumes that the behavior of the whole (aggregates) cannot be reduced to the sum of the parts (agents, markets). This is because interdependencies between markets can substantially amplify, or on the contrary dampen, shocks that at any time disturb the equilibrium. The understanding of general-equilibrium effects, on which direct evidence is limited, which are empirically blurred by multiple potential confounding factors, and for which controlled experiments are almost impossible to design, is necessarily more conjectural than the study of individual behavior or of a specific market. However, ignoring these effects because they do not have the same degree of empirical certainty as a directly observed microeconomic effect can lead to serious policy mistakes.

Keywords: Theory of fluctuations; General equilibrium; Fiscal multipliers (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018-09
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03389352
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published in Revue de l'OFCE, 2018, Whither the Economy?, 3 (157), pp.151-165. ⟨10.3917/reof.157.0151⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03389352/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Is the Study of Business-Cycle Fluctuations “Scientific?” (2018)
Working Paper: Is the study of business-cycle fluctuations 'scientific'? (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03389352

DOI: 10.3917/reof.157.0151

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().